HomeWhat's newSearchAbout usFrequently Asked QuestionsLinksContact
 
Urgent AppealsCampaignsNewsCompaniesPublicationsCodes of Conduct

CCC Reference Guide on Code Implementation & Verification
Section 4. Critical issues on code implementation and verification

Living wages(*) and hours of work


Available Resources >>
The garment industry is renowned for low wages, excessive overtime and poor working conditions. In spite of the fact that consumers are spending more and more on clothes, there are few signs of improvement for workers. In fact, the opposite is the case: downward pressure on wages means that many garment workers find their weekly wage packet is not enough to live on, in spite of the fact that they often work extremely long hours. A living wage is thus defined as a wage that provides for basic needs (housing, energy, nutrition, clothing, health care, education, potable water, child care, transportation, and savings), includes additional discretionary income, and takes into consideration dependents.

Several codes (including the CCC code) call for the payment of a "living wage". Many claim it is impossible to come up with a measurable standard for the living wage, or that wage levels should be determined through collective bargaining between trade unions and management. In fact, there are a variety of techniques actually available to make at least a reasonable estimate of the range in which a living wage would fall, for example by using the "poverty line", the "purchasing power index", the so-called "market basket" approach, or a combination of these methods. Other benchmarks could include "best practice" negotiated wage levels elsewhere in the sector, or the wage levels called for by unions or labour-related groups active in the area. The point about collective bargaining is certainly valid, but when no union is present in the workplace (which is the case in most garment industry workplaces), buyers should ensure that wage levels allow workers to live. This can of course be adjusted later when a collective bargaining process goes into effect. Expecting workers to live off of a wage that simply cannot be lived off of is unrealistic and seems to contradict any claims of "corporate social responsibility" made by buyers.


Available Resources:
  • Let's Clean Up Fashion: the state of pay behind the UK high street
    The state of pay behind the UK high street

    Labour Behind the Label - Sept 2006
    For over a decade, consumers, workers and campaigners have been calling on fashion brands to make sure the workers who produce the clothes they sell are paid a living wage. At the start of 2006, Labour Behind the Label decided it was time to check in with the fashion industry, to see what progress has been made. This report presents the results of our investigation, revealing who is - and isn't - doing what.

  • 2006, A living wage for Sri Lanka's apparel industry workers
    ALaRM - a coalition of trade unions and labour NGOs advocating the rights of Sri Lanka's apparel workers - has carried out a systematic calculation to date of a sector-specific living wage. Providing a sound, technical basis on which future wage negotiations and campaigns can be built upon.

  • July 2005, Background papers prepared by MIT (Harvard) US for the JO-IN project discussions:

  • 336kb) In 2002 the report "Wearing Thin: the State of Pay in the Fashion Industry", was published by The UK network Labour Behind the Label, part of the International Clean Clothes Campaign. The "Wearing Thin" report is the outcome of campaigns begun throughout Europe in 1999 in response to a global deterioration in the wages of garment workers. As part of this study, 12 companies were surveyed and none of them acknowledged the need to pay suppliers a price sufficient to pay workers a living wage.

  • March 2002, We are not machines - Wages. The Like Cutting Bamboo report (September 2000) found that workers' wages were well below what they needed to meet their basic needs and that they were heavily dependent on overtime income.

  • Oct. 1999, ILRF- Empowering Workers Towards A Living Wage. All workers are entitled to earn a living wage whereby they are able to steadily improve their standard of living.

  • 2001, Living Wage Report, Labour Behind the Label (this document will follow soon)

  • June 2000, The "Living Wage" Clause in the ETI Base Code - How to Implement it? By David Steele ETI Information Officer.

  • 2000, Wages study US labor department (this document will follow soon)

  • 2000, Living Wage Analysis, Some Preliminary Comments on a Living Wage for Sri Lankan Garment (and related industries) Workers (this document will follow soon)

  • FLA Living Wage Forum, reading packet. (this document will follow soon)

  • July 2000, Press for Change Initiates "Olympic Living Wage Project"
    Catholic Activists to live on Nike sweatshop wage in Indonesia

  • US Department of labor 308 page 'LIVING WAGE' study now available online

  • Nov 1999, The UK Labour behind the Label Coalition (the UK platform of the CCC has produced a 25 page report on living wage, including case studies. Please find here the executive summary. | Read the report

  • Nov 1999, Empowering Workers Towards A Living Wage
    A Position Paper (International Labor Rights Fund)


Notes:

A living wage is a wage that enables workers to meet their needs for nutritious food and clean water, shelter, clothes, education, health care and transport, as well as allowing for a discretionary income. It should be enough to provide for the basic needs of workers and their families, to allow them to participate fully in society and live with dignity (CCC, 2002).

Go to the top of the pageTell a friend about this siteJoin the Urgent Action Network
More on Codes of Conduct >>