Home Climate Change Green League Previous Green Leagues Green League 2011
 

Select the Universities you want to compare by clicking on them.

Then click the button below.

Select at least 2 Universities...

People & Planet Green League 2011

Peer Group A

Russell Group (all have medical schools) excluding LSE plus specialist medical schools

This table shows a sub-section of all the universities who took part in the People & Planet Green League 2011. The rankings shown are specific to this table only; they are not the institution's overall ranking.

Back to full league

Sub-leagues

The following sub-leagues are also available to help compare universities by peer group:

  • England

  • Northern Ireland

  • Scotland

  • Wales

  • Peer Group A Russell Group (all have medical schools) excluding LSE plus specialist medical schools

  • Peer Group B Non-Russell Group institutions with research income that is 22% of total income or more.

  • Peer Group C Institutions with a Research income of 8%-21% of total income

  • Peer Group D Institutions with a Research income of between 5% and 8% of total income and those with a total income over £12m

  • Peer Group E Teaching institutions with a turnover of between £40m and £119m

  • Peer Group F Smaller teaching institutions

  • Peer Group G Specialist music/arts teaching institutions

Green League 2011 custom sub-league

Rank in this table Class University Policy Performance Total Score
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Energy Sources Waste Carbon Emmissions#Per Head Water consumption

1

2:1

University of Edinburgh

 Excellent performance Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Poor performance no data no data
34.0

2

2:1

 case study

King's College London

 Could do better Could do better Could do better no data Could do better Could do better no data Could do better no data Poor performance Excellent performance Poor performance Poor performance
33.5

3

2:1

Queens University of Belfast

 Excellent performance Could do better Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better no data Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
33.0

4

2:1

 case study

University of Southampton

 Could do better Could do better Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better no data Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better Could do better Poor performance
32.0

5

2:1

 case study

Newcastle University

 Could do better Could do better Could do better no data Could do better Could do better no data Excellent performance no data Poor performance Could do better no data Poor performance
31.5

6=

2:2

 case study

University of Bristol

 Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance no data Poor performance Could do better Could do better Excellent performance no data Poor performance Could do better no data no data
30.5

6=

2:2

University of Cambridge

 Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better no data no data Could do better no data Poor performance no data no data Could do better
30.5

7

2:2

University of Birmingham

 Could do better Excellent performance Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better no data Could do better no data Poor performance Poor performance Could do better Poor performance
30.0

8

2:2

 case study

Imperial College London

 Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance no data Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance no data
29.5

9=

2:2

 case study

University of Leicester

 Could do better Excellent performance Poor performance no data Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance no data no data Poor performance
28.5

9=

2:2

 case study

University of Nottingham

 Could do better Could do better Poor performance no data Poor performance Could do better no data Excellent performance Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better no data Poor performance
28.5

9=

2:2

 case study

University College London

 Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Poor performance Could do better no data Poor performance
28.5

10

2:2

 case study

University of Manchester

 Poor performance Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance no data Poor performance Poor performance no data no data
28.0

11

2:2

University of Warwick

 Could do better Could do better Poor performance no data Could do better Could do better no data Excellent performance no data Poor performance Poor performance no data Poor performance
26.5

12=

2:2

 case study

University of Glasgow

 Could do better Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Could do better Could do better no data Could do better no data Could do better Poor performance no data Poor performance
26.0

12=

2:2

 case study

University of Leeds

 Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Poor performance no data Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance no data Poor performance Could do better no data Poor performance
26.0

13

3rd

 case study

University of Oxford

 Could do better Could do better Poor performance Could do better Poor performance no data Poor performance Excellent performance no data Poor performance Poor performance no data Poor performance
25.5

14

3rd

University of Sheffield

 Could do better Could do better Poor performance no data Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better no data no data Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
23.5

15

3rd

University of Liverpool

 Could do better Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Could do better Could do better no data Could do better no data Poor performance Poor performance no data Poor performance
21.0

16

3rd

St George's, University of London

 Could do better Excellent performance Poor performance Poor performance no data no data no data Poor performance no data Poor performance Poor performance no data no data
20.5

17

Fail

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

 Poor performance Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better Could do better Poor performance Poor performance no data no data Could do better no data Poor performance
20.0

18

Fail

 case study

Cardiff University

 Could do better no data Poor performance no data no data Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better no data Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
16.5

19

Fail

Queen Mary, University of London

 Could do better no data Poor performance Poor performance no data no data Could do better Poor performance no data no data Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
15.0
Performance: Excellent Excellent   Could do betterCould do better   Poor Poor   no dataAwful   no dataNo data               Rank: ↑ better     ↓ worse