Select the Universities you want to compare by clicking on them.

Then click the button below.

Select at least 2 Universities...

People & Planet Green League 2011

Peer Group B

Non-Russell Group institutions with research income that is 22% of total income or more.

This table shows a sub-section of all the universities who took part in the People & Planet Green League 2011. The rankings shown are specific to this table only; they are not the institution's overall ranking.

Back to full league

Sub-leagues

The following sub-leagues are also available to help compare universities by peer group:

  • England

  • Northern Ireland

  • Scotland

  • Wales

  • Peer Group A Russell Group (all have medical schools) excluding LSE plus specialist medical schools

  • Peer Group B Non-Russell Group institutions with research income that is 22% of total income or more.

  • Peer Group C Institutions with a Research income of 8%-21% of total income

  • Peer Group D Institutions with a Research income of between 5% and 8% of total income and those with a total income over £12m

  • Peer Group E Teaching institutions with a turnover of between £40m and £119m

  • Peer Group F Smaller teaching institutions

  • Peer Group G Specialist music/arts teaching institutions

Green League 2011 custom sub-league

Rank in this table Class University Policy Performance Total Score
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Energy Sources Waste Carbon Emmissions#Per Head Water consumption

1

1st

case study

University of East Anglia

Excellent performance Excellent performance Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better Could do better no data
45.5

2

1st

case study

University of Ulster

Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Could do better no data no data Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better
41.5

3

1st

case study

University of Exeter

Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance Excellent performance no data Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
40.0

4

1st

case study

Bangor University

Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance
38.0

5=

1st

case study

University of Aberdeen

Could do better Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance no data Could do better Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
37.0

5=

1st

case study

University of Bath

Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance no data Excellent performance Poor performance Poor performance no data
37.0

5=

1st

case study

University of St Andrews

Could do better Excellent performance Poor performance Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better no data Poor performance
37.0

6

2:1

case study

Durham University

Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance no data no data Could do better no data no data
35.0

7

2:1

Institute of Education

Excellent performance Excellent performance Poor performance Poor performance Excellent performance no data Excellent performance Poor performance no data Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance Could do better
33.0

8

2:1

case study

Loughborough University

Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance no data Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance no data
32.5

9=

2:1

Keele University

Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Poor performance no data Poor performance Poor performance
31.5

9=

2:1

case study

University of Strathclyde

Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Could do better no data no data Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
31.5

10

2:2

case study

University of Essex

Could do better Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better no data Poor performance
30.5

11=

2:2

case study

Cranfield University

Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance no data Could do better no data Poor performance Excellent performance no data Poor performance Poor performance no data no data
30.0

11=

2:2

Goldsmiths, University of London

Could do better Could do better Poor performance Could do better Could do better no data Could do better Excellent performance no data no data Poor performance Could do better Poor performance
30.0

11=

2:2

Royal Holloway, University of London

Could do better Could do better Poor performance Could do better Could do better Could do better no data Excellent performance no data no data Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance
30.0

12

2:2

Lancaster University

Could do better Excellent performance Could do better no data Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance no data no data Could do better no data no data
29.5

13

2:2

case study

University of Dundee

Could do better Could do better Poor performance Could do better Excellent performance Could do better no data Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better no data Poor performance
29.0

14=

2:2

case study

University of Reading

Could do better Could do better Could do better no data Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance no data Poor performance Could do better no data no data
28.5

14=

2:2

University of York

Could do better Could do better Poor performance Could do better Could do better no data no data Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better Poor performance no data
28.5

15

2:2

University of Sussex

Could do better Could do better Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better Could do better Could do better no data Could do better Could do better no data no data
28.0

16

2:2

case study

University of Kent

Could do better Could do better no data Poor performance Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
27.5

17

3rd

Birkbeck, University of London

Could do better no data Poor performance no data Poor performance no data Could do better Could do better no data no data Could do better Could do better Could do better
25.5

18

3rd

case study

Heriot-Watt University

Could do better Could do better Poor performance no data Could do better Could do better Poor performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better no data no data
25.0

19

3rd

case study

University of Surrey

Poor performance Could do better no data Poor performance no data Could do better Poor performance Could do better no data Excellent performance Could do better no data Poor performance
23.5

20

Fail

Swansea University

Could do better no data Could do better no data no data Could do better Poor performance Poor performance no data Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
20.0

21

Fail

The School of Pharmacy

Could do better Could do better no data no data Poor performance no data Poor performance no data no data no data no data no data Poor performance
16.0
Performance: Excellent Excellent   Could do betterCould do better   Poor Poor   no dataAwful   no dataNo data               Rank: ↑ better     ↓ worse