Select the Universities you want to compare by clicking on them.

Then click the button below.

Select at least 2 Universities...

People & Planet Green League 2012

Sub-league by tags

Universities tagged Green Transport. Click on a university to read the case study.

This table shows a sub-section of all the universities who took part in the People & Planet Green League 2012. The rankings shown are specific to this table only; they are not the institution's overall ranking.

Back to full league

Green League 2012 custom sub-league

Rank in this table Class University Policy Performance Total Score
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Energy Sources Waste Carbon Emmissions#Per Head Water consumption

1

1st

case study

Aston University

Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance Could do better no data Excellent performance Could do better Could do better
48.0

2

1st

case studyInfo icon

Cardiff Metropolitan University

Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better no data Excellent performance Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better Could do better Could do better
46.0

3=

1st

case study

Anglia Ruskin University

Excellent performance Could do better Excellent performance no data Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Poor performance Poor performance Could do better Could do better
44.0

3=

1st

case study

Edinburgh Napier University

Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Excellent performance no data Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better
44.0

4=

1st

case study

University of Edinburgh

Excellent performance Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better no data Poor performance
40.5

4=

1st

case study

Kingston University

Excellent performance Could do better Excellent performance no data Poor performance Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Excellent performance no data Could do better Could do better Poor performance
40.5

5=

2:1

case study

University of Chichester

Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better Poor performance
39.5

5=

2:1

case study

University of Lincoln

Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance no data Poor performance Could do better no data Excellent performance no data Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better
39.5

6=

2:1

case study

Queens University of Belfast

Excellent performance Could do better Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better no data Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance Poor performance Poor performance
36.0

6=

2:1

case study

London South Bank University

Excellent performance Could do better Excellent performance no data Poor performance no data no data Excellent performance Excellent performance no data Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
36.0

7=

2:1

case study

University of Aberdeen

Could do better Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance no data Could do better Could do better no data Poor performance
34.0

7=

2:1

case study

University of Dundee

Could do better Could do better Poor performance no data Could do better Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
34.0

8

2:2

case study

University of Southampton

Could do better Could do better Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better no data Could do better no data Poor performance Excellent performance Could do better no data
33.5

9=

2:2

case study

Northumbria University

Could do better Could do better Poor performance no data Poor performance Could do better no data Excellent performance no data Poor performance Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better
31.0

9=

2:2

case study

Queen Mary, University of London

Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Could do better no data Excellent performance no data no data Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance
31.0

10

3rd

case study

Roehampton University

Could do better Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance no data no data Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance
27.5

11

3rd

case study

University of Oxford

Could do better Could do better Poor performance Could do better Poor performance no data no data Excellent performance no data Poor performance Poor performance no data Could do better
26.5

12

3rd

case study

University of Glasgow

Could do better Could do better Poor performance no data Could do better Could do better no data Could do better no data Could do better no data no data Poor performance
26.0

13

Fail

case study

University for the Creative Arts

Could do better Could do better Poor performance no data Could do better no data no data Poor performance no data no data no data Poor performance Could do better
21.0
Performance: Excellent Excellent   Could do betterCould do better   Poor Poor   no dataAwful   no dataNo data               Rank: ↑ better     ↓ worse