Home Climate Change Green League Green League 2012
 

Select the Universities you want to compare by clicking on them.

Then click the button below.

Select at least 2 Universities...

People & Planet Green League 2012

Sub-league by tags

Universities tagged Staff and student engagement. Click on a university to read the case study.

This table shows a sub-section of all the universities who took part in the People & Planet Green League 2012. The rankings shown are specific to this table only; they are not the institution's overall ranking.

Back to full league

Green League 2012 custom sub-league

Rank in this table Class University Policy Performance Total Score
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Energy Sources Waste Carbon Emmissions#Per Head Water consumption

1

1st

 case study

University of Gloucestershire

 Excellent performance Excellent performance Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better Could do better
53.5

2

1st

 case study

University of Central Lancashire

 Excellent performance Could do better Excellent performance no data Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Could do better
52.0

3

1st

 case study

Bournemouth University

 Excellent performance Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better
51.0

4=

1st

 case study

Aston University

 Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance Could do better no data Excellent performance Could do better Could do better
48.0

4=

1st

 case studyInfo icon

University of Worcester

 Excellent performance Could do better Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Excellent performance no data Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance
48.0

5

1st

 case study

Oxford Brookes University

 Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Poor performance Poor performance
47.5

6=

1st

 case study

De Montfort University

 Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Poor performance Could do better no data Excellent performance Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance
47.0

6=

1st

 case study

University of East London

 Excellent performance Could do better Excellent performance no data Poor performance Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better Excellent performance Could do better
47.0

7

1st

 case study

University of Exeter

 Excellent performance Excellent performance Excellent performance Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance no data Excellent performance Poor performance Poor performance
45.5

8=

1st

 case study

Anglia Ruskin University

 Excellent performance Could do better Excellent performance no data Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Poor performance Poor performance Could do better Could do better
44.0

8=

1st

 case study

Coventry University

 Excellent performance Could do better Could do better no data Could do better no data Poor performance Excellent performance no data Poor performance Excellent performance Could do better Could do better
44.0

8=

1st

 case study

Edinburgh Napier University

 Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Excellent performance no data Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better
44.0

8=

1st

 case study

Newcastle University

 Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance no data Could do better Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
44.0

9=

1st

 case study

Canterbury Christ Church University

 Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Poor performance Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Excellent performance no data Poor performance Could do better Poor performance
43.0

9=

1st

 case study

University of Wales, Newport

 Excellent performance Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance
43.0

10=

1st

 case study

University of Edinburgh

 Excellent performance Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better no data Poor performance
40.5

10=

1st

 case study

Kingston University

 Excellent performance Could do better Excellent performance no data Poor performance Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Excellent performance no data Could do better Could do better Poor performance
40.5

11=

2:1

 case study

University of Chichester

 Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better Poor performance
39.5

11=

2:1

 case study

University of Lincoln

 Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance no data Poor performance Could do better no data Excellent performance no data Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better
39.5

12

2:1

 case study

University of Salford

 Could do better Could do better Could do better no data Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better no data Could do better Could do better Could do better
39.0

13

2:1

 case study

Loughborough University

 Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance no data Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
38.5

14=

2:1

 case study

University of Bath

 Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better no data Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance no data Excellent performance no data Poor performance no data
37.5

14=

2:1

 case study

University of Nottingham

 Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better no data Poor performance
37.5

15=

2:1

 case study

City University London

 Could do better Could do better Could do better no data Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance no data no data Poor performance Excellent performance Could do better
37.0

15=

2:1

 case study

University of Manchester

 Excellent performance Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance
37.0

16=

2:1

 case study

University of Chester

 Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Could do better no data no data Could do better Could do better
36.5

16=

2:1

 case study

Keele University

 Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance
36.5

17=

2:1

 case study

Queens University of Belfast

 Excellent performance Could do better Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better no data Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance Poor performance Poor performance
36.0

17=

2:1

 case study

London South Bank University

 Excellent performance Could do better Excellent performance no data Poor performance no data no data Excellent performance Excellent performance no data Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
36.0

18

2:1

 case study

University of Essex

 Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Poor performance Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
34.5

19

2:1

 case study

University of Aberdeen

 Could do better Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance Could do better Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance no data Could do better Could do better no data Poor performance
34.0

20

2:2

 case study

Southampton Solent University

 Could do better Could do better Poor performance Could do better Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance no data no data Could do better Could do better Could do better
33.5

21

2:2

 case study

University of Leicester

 Could do better Excellent performance Poor performance no data Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better no data Poor performance
32.5

22

2:2

 case study

The Robert Gordon University

 Could do better Could do better Poor performance no data Could do better no data no data Could do better no data Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Could do better
31.5

23=

2:2

 case studyInfo icon

University of Leeds

 Could do better Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance Could do better no data Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better no data Poor performance
31.0

23=

2:2

 case study

Queen Mary, University of London

 Could do better Could do better Could do better Excellent performance Could do better Could do better no data Excellent performance no data no data Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance
31.0

24

2:2

 case study

University of Warwick

 Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better Excellent performance Could do better no data Excellent performance no data Poor performance Poor performance no data Poor performance
30.5

25

2:2

 case study

University of Westminster

 Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance no data Poor performance Could do better no data Could do better Could do better no data Poor performance Poor performance Could do better
30.0

26=

2:2

 case study

University of Liverpool

 Excellent performance Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better no data Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance
28.5

26=

2:2

 case studyInfo icon

University of The Arts, London

 Could do better no data Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance no data no data Excellent performance Excellent performance no data Could do better Could do better Could do better
28.5

27=

3rd

 case studyInfo icon

University of Abertay Dundee

 Could do better no data Poor performance Poor performance Could do better Could do better Poor performance no data no data no data Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better
27.5

27=

3rd

 case study

Roehampton University

 Could do better Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Excellent performance no data no data Poor performance Poor performance Poor performance
27.5

28=

3rd

 case study

University of Oxford

 Could do better Could do better Poor performance Could do better Poor performance no data no data Excellent performance no data Poor performance Poor performance no data Could do better
26.5

28=

3rd

 case studyInfo icon

University of Wales, Trinity St. David

 Could do better Could do better Could do better no data no data Could do better no data no data Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Could do better no data
26.5

29=

3rd

 case study

Buckinghamshire New University

 Could do better no data no data no data Could do better Could do better no data Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Poor performance Excellent performance Could do better
26.0

29=

3rd

 case study

University of Glasgow

 Could do better Could do better Poor performance no data Could do better Could do better no data Could do better no data Could do better no data no data Poor performance
26.0

30

3rd

 case study

University of York

 Could do better Could do better Poor performance Could do better Poor performance Could do better no data Could do better no data Poor performance Poor performance no data Poor performance
25.0

31

3rd

 case study

Royal Academy of Music

 Poor performance Excellent performance Poor performance Could do better Poor performance no data no data no data no data no data Could do better Poor performance Poor performance
23.5

32

Fail

 case study

University for the Creative Arts

 Could do better Could do better Poor performance no data Could do better no data no data Poor performance no data no data no data Poor performance Could do better
21.0

33

Fail

 case studyInfo icon

London Business School

 Could do better no data Poor performance no data Could do better no data no data no data no data no data no data no data Poor performance
12.5
Performance: Excellent Excellent   Could do betterCould do better   Poor Poor   no dataAwful   no dataNo data               Rank: ↑ better     ↓ worse