City, University of London People & Planet University League 2017 Scorecard

Award class badge: 1st

Section Score
1. Environmental Sustainability; Policy and Strategy 100
2. Human Resources for Sustainability 65
3. Environmental Auditing & Management Systems 100
4. Ethical Investment 20
5. Carbon Management 50
6. Workers Rights 25
7. Sustainable Food 85
8. Staff and Student Engagement 40
9. Education for Sustainable Development 80
10. Energy Sources 82.5
11. Waste and Recycling 87.5
12. Carbon Reduction 50
13. Water Reduction 67

Section 1. Environmental Sustainability; Policy and Strategy

100%

The full methodology for this section can be found here.

We looked at City, University of London's publicly available environmental policy - you can read it here if we found one:

www.city.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/80751/Environmental-Sustainability-Policy-5_4_2011.pdf

We wanted to see that the policy wasn't just sitting in a dusty desktop year after year and we needed to know that the policy meant something to staff, students and decision makers at the university. So to score 50% here, the policy needed to have been published within the last 5 years and demonstrate that it was reviewed regularly by someone sitting in a senior position at the university (because if the university is failing to uphold their policy, then someone should know about it ..... and be able to do something about it).

1) City, University of London scored: 50 / 50% for their environmental policy

Next we looked at whether the policy was accompanied with a plan for action or Sustainability Strategy, you can read it here if we one found one:

www.city.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/121168/City-Waste-Strategy-2012.pdf

The university could only score 50% if they had set SMART targets in all 8 of key areas below, and if we could see that the strategy had been reviewed in the last 5 years, (much like the environmental policy, a strategy only works if people are using it), and we didn't give credit for strategies that were out of date:

  • Construction & Refurbishment
  • Emissions & Discharges
  • Community involvement
  • Biodiversity
  • Waste management
  • Travel and Transport
  • Sustainable procurement
  • Water

We found that City, University of London is working towards targets in the following areas:

Waste management, Transport, Sustainable Procurement, Water, Construction and Refurbishment, Emissions and Discharges, Community involvement and Biodiversity

Therefore...

2) City, University of London scored 50 / 50% for their sustainability strategy.

65% Section 2. Human Resources for Sustainability

65%

The full methodology for how we score this section here.

Having a policy on environment and ethics is a good start - working out how to meet the policy with a strategy is a great start - next we wanted to see how well City, University of London resource their policy and strategy. You can't meet your targets without dedicated staff to do all the hard work!

We looked to see whether environmental sustainability if someone in the university senior management team has responsibility for sustainability. It really helps when climate and social justice issues are the responsibility of someone who can make decisions about how the action can be resourced. If we found that someone, you can read about them here: www.city.ac.uk/about/city-the-community-and-environment/what-we-do/sustainability-group

1) City, University of London scored 20/20% for senior responsibility for sustainability

We also wanted to see how many staff were currently employed to work on sustainability issues, and whether students and staff could find them easily online and contact them. We thought the number of sustainability staff should also be shown in relation to the number of staff and students at the university.

City, University of London has 12809 students,1000 - 2000 staff and 3 sustainability staff

When assessing the number of dedicated sustainability staff at City, University of London - we looked for the following info:

  • job title / role
  • contact info
  • specific area of sustainability

If we found that information, here's the link: www.city.ac.uk/about/city-the-community-and-environment/what-we-do/sustainability-group

2) City, University of London scored 20/55% for numbers of sustainability staff

Once a university has employed staff, it can be hard for them to do their job without money available. People & Planet looked for evidence that the sustainability strategy was resourced with a budget and that costs were included as part of the commitment.

3) City, University of London scored 10/10% for evidence of a budget to fund the sustainability strategy.

It isn't just the job of sustainability staff ... the whole university community is key to the culture of sustainable development, and when properly supported, they can make all the difference!
We looked at whether the university supported a staff engagement scheme (like Eco-Champions or inter-departmental green team competitions) to engage all staff across the university in environmental and ethical practice through training, workshops and projects.

4) City, University of London scored 15/15% for supporting a staff engagement scheme.

100% Section 3. Environmental Auditing & Management Systems

100%

The full methodology for this section is here.

We looked at how well City, University of London manages and audit their environmental performance and progress. If you can't measure it, you can't improve it!

City, University of London is accredited to an externally verified environmental management system (EMS). It scored 100/100% for the level and coverage of its EMS.

P.S We know this all sounds very technical ... find out more about Environmental Management Systems

20% Section 4. Ethical Investment

20%

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

Investments in the fossil fuel industry or arms trade can be contradictory to an institutions broader sustainability aims and goals. A strong ethical investment policy ensures an institution’s investments and banking practices are conducted transparently and in an economically-viable, socially-responsible manner.

1a) City, University of London scored 10/10% for having a publicly available ethical investment policy. The policy is here if we found one: www.city.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/286495/Ethical-Investment-Policy-July-2014.pdf

1b) and  10/60% for including specifics within the policy, including: Students on committee 10

2) City, University of London scored 0/10% for reviewing and making progress on the policy's objectives - which is here is we found it: (N/A)

3) 0/20% for making a public announcement that it won't invest in fossil fuels and or arms, and if they have, you'll find it here: (N/A)

When looking at our Fossil Free university campaign aims, here's City, University of London's own Fossil Free outlook:

Divestment Commitment none

Fossil Free Scorecard: City, University of London

Investments

£800,000
Invested in fossil fuels. That’s 6.4% of total endowment fund of £12,500,000
Data estimated from FoI

Research funding

£64,000 Research funding from fossil fuel industry, including: BP

£998,883 Research funding into renewables industry since 2001.

Fossil Fuel Industry Links

Honorary degrees awarded to: No honorary degrees awarded.
Board positions given to Fossil Fuel industry: No positions on boards/committees awarded to fossil fuel company executives.

Banking

HSBC £Money in bank
RBS £Money in bank
Barclays £Money in bank
Santander ATMs on campus Branches on campus
Note: Fossil fuel extraction research funding does not include all oils and gas research. Data will be available soon.

50% Section 5. Carbon Management

50%How well is City, University of London managing its carbon emissions?

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

As it's a funding requirement, there aren't many universities that don't have a plan for managing and reducing carbon emissions, here's what we found: www.city.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/72944/City-University-London-Carbon-Management-Plan-Version-2-010311.pdf

1) City, University of London scored 25/25% for having a publicly available carbon management plan that meets set standards

Jargon buster: the following are examples of greenhouse gas emissions called 'scope 3' emissions: business travel, student and staff commute travel, student end of term travel home, supply chain (stuff the university buys) and waste (i.e. rubbish).

2a) 5/5% for including scope 3 emissions within the university Carbon Management Plan.

2b) 5/5% for reporting the university's scope 3 emissions to the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). 

In the most recent year, City, University of London reported emissions from: waste, business travel and supply chain to HESA.

It's important that universities aren't forgetting their halls of residences or other student and staff accommodation when thinking about carbon emissions. If we found info on this, it will be here: (N/A)

2c) City, University of London scored 0/5% for publishing carbon emission data related to both in-house and externally provided student accommodation.

3) City, University of London scored 10/30% for including baseline figures for scope 3 carbon emissions  in the following: Water and Travel. business trips.

City, University of London  scored 5/30% for including targets to reduce scope 3 carbon emissions including Water .

25% Section 6. Workers Rights

25%Is City, University of London behaving responsibly to those it employs and those who work in its supply chains?

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) City, University of London scores 0/25% for being a Living Wage accredited employer.

2) City, University of London scores 15/15% for being a Fairtrade status University

3) City, University of London scores 10/40% for improving workers rights in the university's ITC supply chain by working with Electronics Watch

4) City, University of London scores 0/20% for improving workers rights in an area of the university supply chain other than electronics

85% Section 7. Sustainable Food

85%How sustainable is the food and catering at City, University of London?

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) City, University of London scores 10/10% for having a publicly available sustainable food policy meeting set standards

If we found one, it should be here: www.city.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/372007/Sustainable-Food-Policy-DRAFT-201708.pdf

2) City, University of London scores 40/50% for continual improvement in sustainable food across the university catering outlets and conference services through a sustainable food framework and for the level reached on that framework OR for sustainable food activities

3) City, University of London scores 10/10% for specifying that contract caterers and suppliers meet the requirements of the university sustainable food policy

4a) City, University of London scores 5/5% for being certified to the Marine Stewardship Council standards - ensuring traceability of sustainable fish all the way to your plate

4b) City, University of London scores 0/5% for using local food in university catering or campus to kitchen food projects

4c) City, University of London scores 0/5% for providing free access to drinking water across the university and for highlighting where this can be found on the university website (here if we found it): www.city.ac.uk/water

5) City, University of London scores 15/15% for providing space or other resources for university community food projects

If they are, you can find out more here: www.city.ac.uk/about/city-the-community-and-environment/what-we-do/sustainable-food

40% Section 8. Staff and Student Engagement

40%

How well is City, University of London engaging its staff and students in sustainability?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) City, University of London scores 20/60% for having a strategy in place for student and staff engagement that includes a framework to track progress against smart targets and for including the following engagement actions:

a carbon management plan, b sustainability policy and strategy, d go green or environment themed week and e climate or sustainability or social change campaigns reaching the whole university community

  • Oversight and involvement of students and staff in the development and ongoing monitoring of the university Carbon Management Plan.
  • Oversight and involvement of students and staff in the development and ongoing monitoring of the university environment or sustainability policy / plan / strategy.
  • Engagement opportunities for sustainability are a component of student induction processes.
  • University actively supports an annual Go Green Week or environment / sustainability week.
  • The university runs environmental sustainability campaigns that reach all students and staff.
  • Availability of university funds and / or resources /support for student or staff-led practical sustainability projects

2) City, University of London scores 10/10% for evidence that the university sustainability policy is included in staff inductions, and if it is, you can see more here: www.city.ac.uk/

3) City, University of London scores 10/10% for Trades Union representation on the membership of sustainability strategy committees

4) City, University of London scores 0/10% for student representation on university committees concerned with estates, planning, finance and strategic decision making. 

5) City, University of London scores 0/10% for students' union progress towards environmental sustainability.

80% Section 9. Education for Sustainable Development

80%

How well is City, University of London including sustainability in its education?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) City, University of London scores 20/20% for its public commit to education for sustainable development (ESD)

2a) City, University of London scores50/50% for having a framework or strategy for ESD

2b)

3) City, University of London scores 0/10% for providing suitable support and training for ESD

4) City, University of London scores 0/10% for evidence of student coursework linked to sustainability projects to improve the environmental manegement of the university (often called the Living Lab)

5) 10/10% for supporting or highlighting School, Faculty or Research team projects for Sustainability, including the pedgagogy of sustainability

82.5% Section 10. Energy Sources

82.5%Where does City, University of London get its energy from?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) City, University of London scores 45/45% for using combined heat and power (CHP) energy.

2) City, University of London scores 17.5/35% for generating some its own electricity (the more it generates the higher the score).

3) City, University of London scores 20.0/20% for buying some or all of its electricity from renewable sources. 

87.5% Section 11. Waste and Recycling

87.5%

How does City, University of London perform on waste, as compared to other universities?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) City, University of London scores 37.5/50% for recycling 62.69% of its waste.

2) City, University of London scores 50.0/50% for the amount of waste per head (staff and students) compared to the rest of the sector.

50% Section 12. Carbon Reduction

50%

How well is City, University of London reducing its carbon emissions?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) 0.0/50% for carbon intensity change over the last 12 months (since the last University League).

2) 50.0/50% for achieving a 44.52% reduction in its carbon emissions since a 2005 baseline.

67% Section 13. Water Reduction

67%How responsibly is City, University of London using water?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) 67.0/67% for its use of water per head (staff and students) compared to other universities

2) 0.0/33% for use of grey water (like rain water harvesting)

---Below is the text your uni submitted last year. It might not still be relevant/true/up to date, and is only included here for your convenience. It is your responsibility to edit/remove/update it for an accurate submission this year. Please also delete this note.--- Projects Sustainability Auditing and Monitoring: The University published its estates strategy in May 2012. The strategy details the major refurbishment and new build projects to be delivered across the University’s estate over the next five years. Following an audit of its process and previously delivered projects, City University developed a sustainability monitoring process. The process is closely aligned with the University’s project process and ensures that measurable objectives are identified for all project sustainability aspects. The Project Sustainability Matrix, developed in association with AECOM, ensures that the objectives are aligned with best practice and all statutory and local authority requirements. The matrix is then used to identify the best assessment method for the project, with refurbishment projects using the SKA methodology and new build projects using BREEAM. All refurbishment projects must achieve a minimum silver SKA accreditation at handover and post occupancy with New Build projects requiring a minimum BREEAM excellent rating at both Design and Handover. The University is now working closely with The Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) on the development of a higher education Specific SKA assessment tool. To date four projects have received an initial SKA assessment and are on track to achieve a silver rating at design. City aim to make the resources used in the development of the Sustainability Matrix widely available in the higher education sector, with a view to promoting sustainable construction and refurbishment and the communication of best practice. (Photo of College Building, City University London, is attached to accompany case study)

You’re here – so you know what we do! Will you support us with a small gift to help us do it?