University College London People & Planet University League 2017 Scorecard

Award class badge: 1st

Section Score
1. Environmental Sustainability; Policy and Strategy 100
2. Human Resources for Sustainability 100
3. Environmental Auditing & Management Systems 85
4. Ethical Investment 40
5. Carbon Management 100
6. Workers Rights 10
7. Sustainable Food 80
8. Staff and Student Engagement 70
9. Education for Sustainable Development 55
10. Energy Sources 62.5
11. Waste and Recycling 50
12. Carbon Reduction 32.5
13. Water Reduction 16.8

Section 1. Environmental Sustainability; Policy and Strategy

100%

The full methodology for this section can be found here.

We looked at University College London's publicly available environmental policy - you can read it here if we found one:

www.ucl.ac.uk/greenucl/resources/policy/ES_Policy_2016

We wanted to see that the policy wasn't just sitting in a dusty desktop year after year and we needed to know that the policy meant something to staff, students and decision makers at the university. So to score 50% here, the policy needed to have been published within the last 5 years and demonstrate that it was reviewed regularly by someone sitting in a senior position at the university (because if the university is failing to uphold their policy, then someone should know about it ..... and be able to do something about it).

1) University College London scored: 50 / 50% for their environmental policy

Next we looked at whether the policy was accompanied with a plan for action or Sustainability Strategy, you can read it here if we one found one:

issuu.com/greenucl/docs/ucl_cmp_draft_v1_7

The university could only score 50% if they had set SMART targets in all 8 of key areas below, and if we could see that the strategy had been reviewed in the last 5 years, (much like the environmental policy, a strategy only works if people are using it), and we didn't give credit for strategies that were out of date:

  • Construction & Refurbishment
  • Emissions & Discharges
  • Community involvement
  • Biodiversity
  • Waste management
  • Travel and Transport
  • Sustainable procurement
  • Water

We found that University College London is working towards targets in the following areas:

Waste management, Transport, Sustainable Procurement, Water, Construction and Refurbishment, Emissions and Discharges, Community involvement and Biodiversity

Therefore...

2) University College London scored 50 / 50% for their sustainability strategy.

100% Section 2. Human Resources for Sustainability

100%

The full methodology for how we score this section here.

Having a policy on environment and ethics is a good start - working out how to meet the policy with a strategy is a great start - next we wanted to see how well University College London resource their policy and strategy. You can't meet your targets without dedicated staff to do all the hard work!

We looked to see whether environmental sustainability if someone in the university senior management team has responsibility for sustainability. It really helps when climate and social justice issues are the responsibility of someone who can make decisions about how the action can be resourced. If we found that someone, you can read about them here: www.ucl.ac.uk/estates/about/

1) University College London scored 20/20% for senior responsibility for sustainability

We also wanted to see how many staff were currently employed to work on sustainability issues, and whether students and staff could find them easily online and contact them. We thought the number of sustainability staff should also be shown in relation to the number of staff and students at the university.

University College London has 26275 students,1000 - 2000 staff and 15 sustainability staff

When assessing the number of dedicated sustainability staff at University College London - we looked for the following info:

  • job title / role
  • contact info
  • specific area of sustainability

If we found that information, here's the link: www.ucl.ac.uk/greenucl/contacts/the-sustainability-team

2) University College London scored 55/55% for numbers of sustainability staff

Once a university has employed staff, it can be hard for them to do their job without money available. People & Planet looked for evidence that the sustainability strategy was resourced with a budget and that costs were included as part of the commitment.

3) University College London scored 10/10% for evidence of a budget to fund the sustainability strategy.

It isn't just the job of sustainability staff ... the whole university community is key to the culture of sustainable development, and when properly supported, they can make all the difference!
We looked at whether the university supported a staff engagement scheme (like Eco-Champions or inter-departmental green team competitions) to engage all staff across the university in environmental and ethical practice through training, workshops and projects.

4) University College London scored 15/15% for supporting a staff engagement scheme.

85% Section 3. Environmental Auditing & Management Systems

85%

The full methodology for this section is here.

We looked at how well University College London manages and audit their environmental performance and progress. If you can't measure it, you can't improve it!

University College London is accredited to an externally verified environmental management system (EMS). It scored 85/100% for the level and coverage of its EMS.

P.S We know this all sounds very technical ... find out more about Environmental Management Systems

40% Section 4. Ethical Investment

40%

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

Investments in the fossil fuel industry or arms trade can be contradictory to an institutions broader sustainability aims and goals. A strong ethical investment policy ensures an institution’s investments and banking practices are conducted transparently and in an economically-viable, socially-responsible manner.

1a) University College London scored 10/10% for having a publicly available ethical investment policy. The policy is here if we found one: www.ucl.ac.uk/finance/policies-procedures/investment-policy

1b) and  10/60% for including specifics within the policy, including: Students on committee 10

2) University College London scored 10/10% for reviewing and making progress on the policy's objectives - which is here is we found it: www.ucl.ac.uk/greenucl/what-we-do/ethical-investment

3) 10/20% for making a public announcement that it won't invest in fossil fuels and or arms, and if they have, you'll find it here: Partial fossil fuels and arms. www.ucl.ac.uk/greenucl/what-we-do/ethical-investment

When looking at our Fossil Free university campaign aims, here's University College London's own Fossil Free outlook:

Divestment Commitment partial
Divested from coal and tar sands but not other Fossil Fuels.

Fossil Free Scorecard: University College London

Investments

£17,463,220
Invested in fossil fuels. Including:
  • £2,083,332 BG Group
  • £1,898,384 BP
  • £1,678,220 Shell
That’s 19.3% of total endowment fund of £90,500,000
Data direct from FoI

Research funding

£13,462,669 Research funding from fossil fuel industry, including: BHP Billton, Exxon Mobil, BP

£75,000 Public-funded research into fossil fuel industry.

£5,151,345 Research funding into renewables industry since 2001.

Fossil Fuel Industry Links

£27,500
received in donations from fossil fuel industry 2009-2014 including BP.
Honorary degrees awarded to: John Patrick Kenny, Founder and Chairman of JKX Oil and Gas. Harold William Denis Hughes, former General Manager, British Gas Exploration Companies.
Board positions given to Fossil Fuel industry: Dame DeAnne (Chair of Council) has been chief economist at Shell and at British Airways. In her non-executive career she has served on the boards of global companies including BP, Roche, Lloyds Bank, Deloitte and Jones Lang LaSalle.

Banking

Barclays £78.9m in bank
RBS £38.0k in bank
Bank of China £1.7k in bank
Altyn Bank £82.0k in bank
HSBC £5.0m in bank
ANZ £1.6m in bank
Santander Branches on campus
Note: Fossil fuel extraction research funding does not include all oils and gas research. Data will be available soon.

100% Section 5. Carbon Management

100%How well is University College London managing its carbon emissions?

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

As it's a funding requirement, there aren't many universities that don't have a plan for managing and reducing carbon emissions, here's what we found: www.ucl.ac.uk/greenucl/carbon

1) University College London scored 25/25% for having a publicly available carbon management plan that meets set standards

Jargon buster: the following are examples of greenhouse gas emissions called 'scope 3' emissions: business travel, student and staff commute travel, student end of term travel home, supply chain (stuff the university buys) and waste (i.e. rubbish).

2a) 5/5% for including scope 3 emissions within the university Carbon Management Plan.

2b) 5/5% for reporting the university's scope 3 emissions to the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). 

In the most recent year, University College London reported emissions from: waste, business travel and supply chain to HESA.

It's important that universities aren't forgetting their halls of residences or other student and staff accommodation when thinking about carbon emissions. If we found info on this, it will be here: (N/A)

2c) University College London scored 5/5% for publishing carbon emission data related to both in-house and externally provided student accommodation.

3) University College London scored 30/30% for including baseline figures for scope 3 carbon emissions  in the following: Waste , Water , Procurement, Travel. business trips, Travel. commute and Travel. student end of term.

University College London  scored 30/30% for including targets to reduce scope 3 carbon emissions including Waste , Water , Procurement, Travel. business trips, Travel. commute and Travel. student end of term.

10% Section 6. Workers Rights

10%Is University College London behaving responsibly to those it employs and those who work in its supply chains?

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) University College London scores 0/25% for being a Living Wage accredited employer.

2) University College London scores 0/15% for being a Fairtrade status University

3) University College London scores 10/40% for improving workers rights in the university's ITC supply chain by working with Electronics Watch

4) University College London scores 0/20% for improving workers rights in an area of the university supply chain other than electronics

80% Section 7. Sustainable Food

80%How sustainable is the food and catering at University College London?

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) University College London scores 10/10% for having a publicly available sustainable food policy meeting set standards

If we found one, it should be here: (N/A)

2) University College London scores 30/50% for continual improvement in sustainable food across the university catering outlets and conference services through a sustainable food framework and for the level reached on that framework OR for sustainable food activities

3) University College London scores 10/10% for specifying that contract caterers and suppliers meet the requirements of the university sustainable food policy

4a) University College London scores 5/5% for being certified to the Marine Stewardship Council standards - ensuring traceability of sustainable fish all the way to your plate

4b) University College London scores 5/5% for using local food in university catering or campus to kitchen food projects

4c) University College London scores 5/5% for providing free access to drinking water across the university and for highlighting where this can be found on the university website (here if we found it): walkruncycleucl.wordpress.com/campus-facilities/

5) University College London scores 15/15% for providing space or other resources for university community food projects

If they are, you can find out more here: www.ucl.ac.uk/greenucl/get-involved/institute-of-education-gardens

70% Section 8. Staff and Student Engagement

70%

How well is University College London engaging its staff and students in sustainability?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) University College London scores 50/60% for having a strategy in place for student and staff engagement that includes a framework to track progress against smart targets and for including the following engagement actions:

a carbon management plan, b sustainability policy and strategy, e climate or sustainability or social change campaigns reaching the whole university community, f providing resources or funding for student or staff led sustainability projects and g university has set strategy and targets for student and staff engagement

  • Oversight and involvement of students and staff in the development and ongoing monitoring of the university Carbon Management Plan.
  • Oversight and involvement of students and staff in the development and ongoing monitoring of the university environment or sustainability policy / plan / strategy.
  • Engagement opportunities for sustainability are a component of student induction processes.
  • University actively supports an annual Go Green Week or environment / sustainability week.
  • The university runs environmental sustainability campaigns that reach all students and staff.
  • Availability of university funds and / or resources /support for student or staff-led practical sustainability projects

2) University College London scores 10/10% for evidence that the university sustainability policy is included in staff inductions, and if it is, you can see more here: www.ucl.ac.uk/greenucl/what-we-do/2016_08_05_notesongreenleague_rj.pdf

3) University College London scores 10/10% for Trades Union representation on the membership of sustainability strategy committees

4) University College London scores 0/10% for student representation on university committees concerned with estates, planning, finance and strategic decision making. 

5) University College London scores 0/10% for students' union progress towards environmental sustainability.

55% Section 9. Education for Sustainable Development

55%

How well is University College London including sustainability in its education?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) University College London scores 10/20% for its public commit to education for sustainable development (ESD)

2a) University College London scores25/50% for having a framework or strategy for ESD

2b)

3) University College London scores 0/10% for providing suitable support and training for ESD

4) University College London scores 10/10% for evidence of student coursework linked to sustainability projects to improve the environmental manegement of the university (often called the Living Lab)

5) 10/10% for supporting or highlighting School, Faculty or Research team projects for Sustainability, including the pedgagogy of sustainability

62.5% Section 10. Energy Sources

62.5%Where does University College London get its energy from?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) University College London scores 45/45% for using combined heat and power (CHP) energy.

2) University College London scores 17.5/35% for generating some its own electricity (the more it generates the higher the score).

3) University College London scores 0.0/20% for buying some or all of its electricity from renewable sources. 

50% Section 11. Waste and Recycling

50%

How does University College London perform on waste, as compared to other universities?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) University College London scores 37.5/50% for recycling 65.97% of its waste.

2) University College London scores 12.5/50% for the amount of waste per head (staff and students) compared to the rest of the sector.

32.5% Section 12. Carbon Reduction

32.5%

How well is University College London reducing its carbon emissions?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) 20.0/50% for carbon intensity change over the last 12 months (since the last University League).

2) 12.5/50% for achieving a 2.02% reduction in its carbon emissions since a 2005 baseline.

16.8% Section 13. Water Reduction

16.8%How responsibly is University College London using water?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) 16.8/67% for its use of water per head (staff and students) compared to other universities

2) 0.0/33% for use of grey water (like rain water harvesting)

---Below is the text your uni submitted last year. It might not still be relevant/true/up to date, and is only included here for your convenience. It is your responsibility to edit/remove/update it for an accurate submission this year. Please also delete this note.--- We have been shortlisted for the S-Lab award for Laboratory Effectiveness: An Online Resource Exchange Enables Sharing and Donation of Laboratory Equipment and Supplies to Reduce Carbon, Costs and Waste We are working to ensure that our online resources exchange is used in the procurement of lab equipment, ensuring that our waste and procurement loop is closed. www.effectivelab.org.uk/awards.html

We depend on grassroots donations to keep us independent and radical.