Kingston University People & Planet University League 2017 Scorecard

Award class badge: 2:2

Section Score
1. Environmental Sustainability; Policy and Strategy 70
2. Human Resources for Sustainability 35
3. Environmental Auditing & Management Systems 40
4. Ethical Investment 0
5. Carbon Management 5
6. Workers Rights 55
7. Sustainable Food 20
8. Staff and Student Engagement 20
9. Education for Sustainable Development 80
10. Energy Sources 17.5
11. Waste and Recycling 50
12. Carbon Reduction 55
13. Water Reduction 16.8

Section 1. Environmental Sustainability; Policy and Strategy

70%

The full methodology for this section can be found here.

We looked at Kingston University's publicly available environmental policy - you can read it here if we found one:

cdn.kingston.ac.uk/documents/aboutkingstonuniversity/sustainability/policies-and-reports/documents/sustainability-policy.pdf

We wanted to see that the policy wasn't just sitting in a dusty desktop year after year and we needed to know that the policy meant something to staff, students and decision makers at the university. So to score 50% here, the policy needed to have been published within the last 5 years and demonstrate that it was reviewed regularly by someone sitting in a senior position at the university (because if the university is failing to uphold their policy, then someone should know about it ..... and be able to do something about it).

1) Kingston University scored: 50 / 50% for their environmental policy

Next we looked at whether the policy was accompanied with a plan for action or Sustainability Strategy, you can read it here if we one found one:

(N/A)

The university could only score 50% if they had set SMART targets in all 8 of key areas below, and if we could see that the strategy had been reviewed in the last 5 years, (much like the environmental policy, a strategy only works if people are using it), and we didn't give credit for strategies that were out of date:

  • Construction & Refurbishment
  • Emissions & Discharges
  • Community involvement
  • Biodiversity
  • Waste management
  • Travel and Transport
  • Sustainable procurement
  • Water

We found that Kingston University is working towards targets in the following areas:

Transport, Sustainable Procurement, Water, Construction and Refurbishment and Biodiversity

Therefore...

2) Kingston University scored 20 / 50% for their sustainability strategy.

35% Section 2. Human Resources for Sustainability

35%

The full methodology for how we score this section here.

Having a policy on environment and ethics is a good start - working out how to meet the policy with a strategy is a great start - next we wanted to see how well Kingston University resource their policy and strategy. You can't meet your targets without dedicated staff to do all the hard work!

We looked to see whether environmental sustainability if someone in the university senior management team has responsibility for sustainability. It really helps when climate and social justice issues are the responsibility of someone who can make decisions about how the action can be resourced. If we found that someone, you can read about them here: www.kingston.ac.uk/aboutkingstonuniversity/howtheuniversityworks/thevicechancellorsoffice/director-of-finance/

1) Kingston University scored 20/20% for senior responsibility for sustainability

We also wanted to see how many staff were currently employed to work on sustainability issues, and whether students and staff could find them easily online and contact them. We thought the number of sustainability staff should also be shown in relation to the number of staff and students at the university.

Kingston University has 15790 students,1000 - 2000 staff and 5 sustainability staff

When assessing the number of dedicated sustainability staff at Kingston University - we looked for the following info:

  • job title / role
  • contact info
  • specific area of sustainability

If we found that information, here's the link: www.kingston.ac.uk/sustainability/team/

2) Kingston University scored 0/55% for numbers of sustainability staff

Once a university has employed staff, it can be hard for them to do their job without money available. People & Planet looked for evidence that the sustainability strategy was resourced with a budget and that costs were included as part of the commitment.

3) Kingston University scored 0/10% for evidence of a budget to fund the sustainability strategy.

It isn't just the job of sustainability staff ... the whole university community is key to the culture of sustainable development, and when properly supported, they can make all the difference!
We looked at whether the university supported a staff engagement scheme (like Eco-Champions or inter-departmental green team competitions) to engage all staff across the university in environmental and ethical practice through training, workshops and projects.

4) Kingston University scored 15/15% for supporting a staff engagement scheme.

40% Section 3. Environmental Auditing & Management Systems

40%

The full methodology for this section is here.

We looked at how well Kingston University manages and audit their environmental performance and progress. If you can't measure it, you can't improve it!

Kingston University is accredited to an externally verified environmental management system (EMS). It scored 40/100% for the level and coverage of its EMS.

P.S We know this all sounds very technical ... find out more about Environmental Management Systems

0% Section 4. Ethical Investment

0%

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

Investments in the fossil fuel industry or arms trade can be contradictory to an institutions broader sustainability aims and goals. A strong ethical investment policy ensures an institution’s investments and banking practices are conducted transparently and in an economically-viable, socially-responsible manner.

1a) Kingston University scored 0/10% for having a publicly available ethical investment policy. The policy is here if we found one: (N/A)

1b) and  0/60% for including specifics within the policy, including: (N/A)

2) Kingston University scored 0/10% for reviewing and making progress on the policy's objectives - which is here is we found it: (N/A)

3) 0/20% for making a public announcement that it won't invest in fossil fuels and or arms, and if they have, you'll find it here: (N/A)

When looking at our Fossil Free university campaign aims, here's Kingston University's own Fossil Free outlook:

Divestment Commitment none

Fossil Free Scorecard: Kingston University

Investments

£0
Invested in fossil fuels.
Data direct from FoI

Research funding

£188,090 Research funding from fossil fuel industry, including: Statoil

£39,747 Research funding into renewables industry since 2001.

Fossil Fuel Industry Links

Honorary degrees awarded to: No honorary degrees awarded.
Board positions given to Fossil Fuel industry: No positions on boards/committees awarded to fossil fuel company executives.

Banking

Nationwide £14.0m in bank
Santander £14.0m in bank
Lloyds £233.0k in bank
Barclays £9.9m in bank ATMs on campus
Note: Fossil fuel extraction research funding may not include all oils and gas research. Updated data will be available soon.
Note: Although their are no current investments in fossil fuel companies, there is no policy in place to prevent future investments.

5% Section 5. Carbon Management

5%How well is Kingston University managing its carbon emissions?

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

As it's a funding requirement, there aren't many universities that don't have a plan for managing and reducing carbon emissions, here's what we found: (N/A)

1) Kingston University scored 0/25% for having a publicly available carbon management plan that meets set standards

Jargon buster: the following are examples of greenhouse gas emissions called 'scope 3' emissions: business travel, student and staff commute travel, student end of term travel home, supply chain (stuff the university buys) and waste (i.e. rubbish).

2a) 0/5% for including scope 3 emissions within the university Carbon Management Plan.

2b) 5/5% for reporting the university's scope 3 emissions to the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). 

In the most recent year, Kingston University reported emissions from: waste, business travel , staff commute, student commute and supply chain to HESA.

It's important that universities aren't forgetting their halls of residences or other student and staff accommodation when thinking about carbon emissions. If we found info on this, it will be here: (N/A)

2c) Kingston University scored 0/5% for publishing carbon emission data related to both in-house and externally provided student accommodation.

3) Kingston University scored 0/30% for including baseline figures for scope 3 carbon emissions  in the following: (N/A).

Kingston University  scored 0/30% for including targets to reduce scope 3 carbon emissions including (N/A).

55% Section 6. Workers Rights

55%Is Kingston University behaving responsibly to those it employs and those who work in its supply chains?

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) Kingston University scores 0/25% for being a Living Wage accredited employer.

2) Kingston University scores 15/15% for being a Fairtrade status University

3) Kingston University scores 40/40% for improving workers rights in the university's ITC supply chain by working with Electronics Watch

4) Kingston University scores 0/20% for improving workers rights in an area of the university supply chain other than electronics

20% Section 7. Sustainable Food

20%How sustainable is the food and catering at Kingston University?

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) Kingston University scores 0/10% for having a publicly available sustainable food policy meeting set standards

If we found one, it should be here: cdn.kingston.ac.uk/documents/sustainability/documents/food-policy.pdf

2) Kingston University scores 20/50% for continual improvement in sustainable food across the university catering outlets and conference services through a sustainable food framework and for the level reached on that framework OR for sustainable food activities

3) Kingston University scores 0/10% for specifying that contract caterers and suppliers meet the requirements of the university sustainable food policy

4a) Kingston University scores 0/5% for being certified to the Marine Stewardship Council standards - ensuring traceability of sustainable fish all the way to your plate

4b) Kingston University scores 0/5% for using local food in university catering or campus to kitchen food projects

4c) Kingston University scores 0/5% for providing free access to drinking water across the university and for highlighting where this can be found on the university website (here if we found it): (N/A)

5) Kingston University scores 0/15% for providing space or other resources for university community food projects

If they are, you can find out more here: (N/A)

20% Section 8. Staff and Student Engagement

20%

How well is Kingston University engaging its staff and students in sustainability?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) Kingston University scores 10/60% for having a strategy in place for student and staff engagement that includes a framework to track progress against smart targets and for including the following engagement actions:

d go green or environment themed week and e climate or sustainability or social change campaigns reaching the whole university community

  • Oversight and involvement of students and staff in the development and ongoing monitoring of the university Carbon Management Plan.
  • Oversight and involvement of students and staff in the development and ongoing monitoring of the university environment or sustainability policy / plan / strategy.
  • Engagement opportunities for sustainability are a component of student induction processes.
  • University actively supports an annual Go Green Week or environment / sustainability week.
  • The university runs environmental sustainability campaigns that reach all students and staff.
  • Availability of university funds and / or resources /support for student or staff-led practical sustainability projects

2) Kingston University scores 0/10% for evidence that the university sustainability policy is included in staff inductions, and if it is, you can see more here: (N/A)

3) Kingston University scores 0/10% for Trades Union representation on the membership of sustainability strategy committees

4) Kingston University scores 0/10% for student representation on university committees concerned with estates, planning, finance and strategic decision making. 

5) Kingston University scores 10/10% for students' union progress towards environmental sustainability.

80% Section 9. Education for Sustainable Development

80%

How well is Kingston University including sustainability in its education?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) Kingston University scores 10/20% for its public commit to education for sustainable development (ESD)

2a) Kingston University scores50/50% for having a framework or strategy for ESD

2b)

3) Kingston University scores 10/10% for providing suitable support and training for ESD

4) Kingston University scores 0/10% for evidence of student coursework linked to sustainability projects to improve the environmental manegement of the university (often called the Living Lab)

5) 10/10% for supporting or highlighting School, Faculty or Research team projects for Sustainability, including the pedgagogy of sustainability

17.5% Section 10. Energy Sources

17.5%Where does Kingston University get its energy from?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) Kingston University scores 0/45% for using combined heat and power (CHP) energy.

2) Kingston University scores 17.5/35% for generating some its own electricity (the more it generates the higher the score).

3) Kingston University scores 0.0/20% for buying some or all of its electricity from renewable sources. 

50% Section 11. Waste and Recycling

50%

How does Kingston University perform on waste, as compared to other universities?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) Kingston University scores 12.5/50% for recycling 33.97% of its waste.

2) Kingston University scores 37.5/50% for the amount of waste per head (staff and students) compared to the rest of the sector.

55% Section 12. Carbon Reduction

55%

How well is Kingston University reducing its carbon emissions?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) 30.0/50% for carbon intensity change over the last 12 months (since the last University League).

2) 25.0/50% for achieving a 20.14% reduction in its carbon emissions since a 2005 baseline.

16.8% Section 13. Water Reduction

16.8%How responsibly is Kingston University using water?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) 16.8/67% for its use of water per head (staff and students) compared to other universities

2) 0.0/33% for use of grey water (like rain water harvesting)

(N/A)

You’re here – so you know what we do! Will you support us with a small gift to help us do it?