University of Surrey People & Planet University League 2017 Scorecard

Award class badge: 2:2

Section Score
1. Environmental Sustainability; Policy and Strategy 50
2. Human Resources for Sustainability 35
3. Environmental Auditing & Management Systems 75
4. Ethical Investment 55
5. Carbon Management 30
6. Workers Rights 10
7. Sustainable Food 40
8. Staff and Student Engagement 10
9. Education for Sustainable Development 45
10. Energy Sources 86.7
11. Waste and Recycling 37.5
12. Carbon Reduction 42.5
13. Water Reduction 22

Section 1. Environmental Sustainability; Policy and Strategy

50%

The full methodology for this section can be found here.

We looked at University of Surrey's publicly available environmental policy - you can read it here if we found one:

www.surrey.ac.uk/policies/environmental_policy.pdf

We wanted to see that the policy wasn't just sitting in a dusty desktop year after year and we needed to know that the policy meant something to staff, students and decision makers at the university. So to score 50% here, the policy needed to have been published within the last 5 years and demonstrate that it was reviewed regularly by someone sitting in a senior position at the university (because if the university is failing to uphold their policy, then someone should know about it ..... and be able to do something about it).

1) University of Surrey scored: 50 / 50% for their environmental policy

Next we looked at whether the policy was accompanied with a plan for action or Sustainability Strategy, you can read it here if we one found one:

(N/A)

The university could only score 50% if they had set SMART targets in all 8 of key areas below, and if we could see that the strategy had been reviewed in the last 5 years, (much like the environmental policy, a strategy only works if people are using it), and we didn't give credit for strategies that were out of date:

  • Construction & Refurbishment
  • Emissions & Discharges
  • Community involvement
  • Biodiversity
  • Waste management
  • Travel and Transport
  • Sustainable procurement
  • Water

We found that University of Surrey is working towards targets in the following areas:

Sustainable Procurement and Construction and Refurbishment

Therefore...

2) University of Surrey scored 0 / 50% for their sustainability strategy.

35% Section 2. Human Resources for Sustainability

35%

The full methodology for how we score this section here.

Having a policy on environment and ethics is a good start - working out how to meet the policy with a strategy is a great start - next we wanted to see how well University of Surrey resource their policy and strategy. You can't meet your targets without dedicated staff to do all the hard work!

We looked to see whether environmental sustainability if someone in the university senior management team has responsibility for sustainability. It really helps when climate and social justice issues are the responsibility of someone who can make decisions about how the action can be resourced. If we found that someone, you can read about them here: www.surrey.ac.uk/about/management-and-strategy/executive-board

1) University of Surrey scored 0/20% for senior responsibility for sustainability

We also wanted to see how many staff were currently employed to work on sustainability issues, and whether students and staff could find them easily online and contact them. We thought the number of sustainability staff should also be shown in relation to the number of staff and students at the university.

University of Surrey has 11250 students,1000 - 2000 staff and 4 sustainability staff

When assessing the number of dedicated sustainability staff at University of Surrey - we looked for the following info:

  • job title / role
  • contact info
  • specific area of sustainability

If we found that information, here's the link: www.surrey.ac.uk/sustainability/contact-us

2) University of Surrey scored 20/55% for numbers of sustainability staff

Once a university has employed staff, it can be hard for them to do their job without money available. People & Planet looked for evidence that the sustainability strategy was resourced with a budget and that costs were included as part of the commitment.

3) University of Surrey scored 0/10% for evidence of a budget to fund the sustainability strategy.

It isn't just the job of sustainability staff ... the whole university community is key to the culture of sustainable development, and when properly supported, they can make all the difference!
We looked at whether the university supported a staff engagement scheme (like Eco-Champions or inter-departmental green team competitions) to engage all staff across the university in environmental and ethical practice through training, workshops and projects.

4) University of Surrey scored 15/15% for supporting a staff engagement scheme.

75% Section 3. Environmental Auditing & Management Systems

75%

The full methodology for this section is here.

We looked at how well University of Surrey manages and audit their environmental performance and progress. If you can't measure it, you can't improve it!

University of Surrey is accredited to an externally verified environmental management system (EMS). It scored 75/100% for the level and coverage of its EMS.

P.S We know this all sounds very technical ... find out more about Environmental Management Systems

55% Section 4. Ethical Investment

55%

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

Investments in the fossil fuel industry or arms trade can be contradictory to an institutions broader sustainability aims and goals. A strong ethical investment policy ensures an institution’s investments and banking practices are conducted transparently and in an economically-viable, socially-responsible manner.

1a) University of Surrey scored 10/10% for having a publicly available ethical investment policy. The policy is here if we found one: www.surrey.ac.uk/policies/ethical_investment_policy.pdf

1b) and  30/60% for including specifics within the policy, including: Students on committee 10 and Screen - Arms Full 10

2) University of Surrey scored 0/10% for reviewing and making progress on the policy's objectives - which is here is we found it: (N/A)

3) 15/20% for making a public announcement that it won't invest in fossil fuels and or arms, and if they have, you'll find it here: cleantechnica.com/2015/10/21/university-of-surrey-commits-divest-fossil-fuels/

When looking at our Fossil Free university campaign aims, here's University of Surrey's own Fossil Free outlook:

Divestment Commitment full
Divested from all fossil fuels

Fossil Free Scorecard: University of Surrey

Investments

£176,422
Invested in fossil fuels. Including:
  • £99,470 SSE
  • £44,151 Petrofac
  • £32,801 BHP Billiton
That’s 4.1% of total endowment fund of £4,264,969
Data direct from FoI

Research funding

£1,610,030 Research funding from fossil fuel industry, including: BP, Exxon Mobil, Shell

£1,854,238 Research funding into renewables industry since 2001.

Fossil Fuel Industry Links

Honorary degrees awarded to: John Browne, Chief Exectuve of BP (1998-2007).

Banking

NatWest £9.5m in bank
Barclays £3.4m in bank
Lloyds £9.8m in bank
Santander £16.1m in bank ATMs on campus Branches on campus
Nationwide £16.1m in bank
National Bank of Kuwait £5.0m in bank
Qatar National Bank £5.0m in bank
YourCash ATMs on campus

30% Section 5. Carbon Management

30%How well is University of Surrey managing its carbon emissions?

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

As it's a funding requirement, there aren't many universities that don't have a plan for managing and reducing carbon emissions, here's what we found: www.surrey.ac.uk/policies/universityofsurreycarbonmanagementplan.pdf

1) University of Surrey scored 25/25% for having a publicly available carbon management plan that meets set standards

Jargon buster: the following are examples of greenhouse gas emissions called 'scope 3' emissions: business travel, student and staff commute travel, student end of term travel home, supply chain (stuff the university buys) and waste (i.e. rubbish).

2a) 0/5% for including scope 3 emissions within the university Carbon Management Plan.

2b) 5/5% for reporting the university's scope 3 emissions to the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). 

In the most recent year, University of Surrey reported emissions from: (N/A) to HESA.

It's important that universities aren't forgetting their halls of residences or other student and staff accommodation when thinking about carbon emissions. If we found info on this, it will be here: (N/A)

2c) University of Surrey scored 0/5% for publishing carbon emission data related to both in-house and externally provided student accommodation.

3) University of Surrey scored 0/30% for including baseline figures for scope 3 carbon emissions  in the following: (N/A).

University of Surrey  scored 0/30% for including targets to reduce scope 3 carbon emissions including (N/A).

10% Section 6. Workers Rights

10%Is University of Surrey behaving responsibly to those it employs and those who work in its supply chains?

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) University of Surrey scores 0/25% for being a Living Wage accredited employer.

2) University of Surrey scores 0/15% for being a Fairtrade status University

3) University of Surrey scores 10/40% for improving workers rights in the university's ITC supply chain by working with Electronics Watch

4) University of Surrey scores 0/20% for improving workers rights in an area of the university supply chain other than electronics

40% Section 7. Sustainable Food

40%How sustainable is the food and catering at University of Surrey?

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) University of Surrey scores 0/10% for having a publicly available sustainable food policy meeting set standards

If we found one, it should be here: www.surrey.ac.uk/policies/hospitality_catering_sustainability_policy.htm

2) University of Surrey scores 20/50% for continual improvement in sustainable food across the university catering outlets and conference services through a sustainable food framework and for the level reached on that framework OR for sustainable food activities

3) University of Surrey scores 0/10% for specifying that contract caterers and suppliers meet the requirements of the university sustainable food policy

4a) University of Surrey scores 0/5% for being certified to the Marine Stewardship Council standards - ensuring traceability of sustainable fish all the way to your plate

4b) University of Surrey scores 5/5% for using local food in university catering or campus to kitchen food projects

4c) University of Surrey scores 5/5% for providing free access to drinking water across the university and for highlighting where this can be found on the university website (here if we found it): (N/A)

5) University of Surrey scores 15/15% for providing space or other resources for university community food projects

If they are, you can find out more here: gardensoc.wordpress.com/

10% Section 8. Staff and Student Engagement

10%

How well is University of Surrey engaging its staff and students in sustainability?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) University of Surrey scores 10/60% for having a strategy in place for student and staff engagement that includes a framework to track progress against smart targets and for including the following engagement actions:

d go green or environment themed week and f providing resources or funding for student or staff led sustainability projects

  • Oversight and involvement of students and staff in the development and ongoing monitoring of the university Carbon Management Plan.
  • Oversight and involvement of students and staff in the development and ongoing monitoring of the university environment or sustainability policy / plan / strategy.
  • Engagement opportunities for sustainability are a component of student induction processes.
  • University actively supports an annual Go Green Week or environment / sustainability week.
  • The university runs environmental sustainability campaigns that reach all students and staff.
  • Availability of university funds and / or resources /support for student or staff-led practical sustainability projects

2) University of Surrey scores 0/10% for evidence that the university sustainability policy is included in staff inductions, and if it is, you can see more here: (N/A)

3) University of Surrey scores 0/10% for Trades Union representation on the membership of sustainability strategy committees

4) University of Surrey scores 0/10% for student representation on university committees concerned with estates, planning, finance and strategic decision making. 

5) University of Surrey scores 0/10% for students' union progress towards environmental sustainability.

45% Section 9. Education for Sustainable Development

45%

How well is University of Surrey including sustainability in its education?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) University of Surrey scores 10/20% for its public commit to education for sustainable development (ESD)

2a) University of Surrey scores25/50% for having a framework or strategy for ESD

2b)

3) University of Surrey scores 0/10% for providing suitable support and training for ESD

4) University of Surrey scores 0/10% for evidence of student coursework linked to sustainability projects to improve the environmental manegement of the university (often called the Living Lab)

5) 10/10% for supporting or highlighting School, Faculty or Research team projects for Sustainability, including the pedgagogy of sustainability

86.7% Section 10. Energy Sources

86.7%Where does University of Surrey get its energy from?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) University of Surrey scores 45/45% for using combined heat and power (CHP) energy.

2) University of Surrey scores 35.0/35% for generating some its own electricity (the more it generates the higher the score).

3) University of Surrey scores 6.7/20% for buying some or all of its electricity from renewable sources. 

37.5% Section 11. Waste and Recycling

37.5%

How does University of Surrey perform on waste, as compared to other universities?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) University of Surrey scores 25.0/50% for recycling 49.95% of its waste.

2) University of Surrey scores 12.5/50% for the amount of waste per head (staff and students) compared to the rest of the sector.

42.5% Section 12. Carbon Reduction

42.5%

How well is University of Surrey reducing its carbon emissions?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) 30.0/50% for carbon intensity change over the last 12 months (since the last University League).

2) 12.5/50% for achieving a 9.75% reduction in its carbon emissions since a 2005 baseline.

22% Section 13. Water Reduction

22%How responsibly is University of Surrey using water?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) 0.0/67% for its use of water per head (staff and students) compared to other universities

2) 22.0/33% for use of grey water (like rain water harvesting)

---Below is the text your uni submitted last year. It might not still be relevant/true/up to date, and is only included here for your convenience. It is your responsibility to edit/remove/update it for an accurate submission this year. Please also delete this note.--- In 2012 Surrey University and the British Heart Foundation ran a successful reuse campaign aimed at students in halls of residence. A combination of a focused end of year move-out programme and permanent donation banks, communicated through a series of posters, leaflets, online communications and a youtube video, resulted in a massive 20 tonnes of items being collected and re-sold in local British Heart Foundation stores. The end of year move out alone collected nearly 12 tonnes of clothing and furniture, raising over £15,000 for a great cause. The whole year campaign was estimated to have raised around £28,000. The British Heart Foundation praised the success of the campaign: “We saw a brilliant level of collections at the Surrey site and the new banks were well-used by students. The campus saw very good participation; this could be due to the donation bins being on site in easily accessible locations for students to donate and the fantastic commitment of the estates team in collecting and using the bins.” As well as the popular permanent banks and donation bins which are used year-round, plans are already well underway to develop the scheme for 2013. In order to increase the success of the campaign, the intention is for the British Heart Foundation to attend university events such as Freshers Week and Go Green Week and organise partnership activities with BHF Retail, such as fashion shows, and shoe amnesty events.

10 years of the People & Planet University League – support us to do more.