Courtauld Institute of Art People & Planet University League 2017 Scorecard

Fail

Section Score
1. Environmental Sustainability; Policy and Strategy 0
2. Human Resources for Sustainability 0
3. Environmental Auditing & Management Systems 10
4. Ethical Investment 0
5. Carbon Management 90
6. Workers Rights 10
7. Sustainable Food 0
8. Staff and Student Engagement 15
9. Education for Sustainable Development 0
10. Energy Sources 0
11. Waste and Recycling 0
12. Carbon Reduction 77.5
13. Water Reduction 0

Section 1. Environmental Sustainability; Policy and Strategy

0%

The full methodology for this section can be found here.

We looked at Courtauld Institute of Art's publicly available environmental policy - you can read it here if we found one:

(N/A)

We wanted to see that the policy wasn't just sitting in a dusty desktop year after year and we needed to know that the policy meant something to staff, students and decision makers at the university. So to score 50% here, the policy needed to have been published within the last 5 years and demonstrate that it was reviewed regularly by someone sitting in a senior position at the university (because if the university is failing to uphold their policy, then someone should know about it ..... and be able to do something about it).

1) Courtauld Institute of Art scored: 0 / 50% for their environmental policy

Next we looked at whether the policy was accompanied with a plan for action or Sustainability Strategy, you can read it here if we one found one:

(N/A)

The university could only score 50% if they had set SMART targets in all 8 of key areas below, and if we could see that the strategy had been reviewed in the last 5 years, (much like the environmental policy, a strategy only works if people are using it), and we didn't give credit for strategies that were out of date:

  • Construction & Refurbishment
  • Emissions & Discharges
  • Community involvement
  • Biodiversity
  • Waste management
  • Travel and Transport
  • Sustainable procurement
  • Water

We found that Courtauld Institute of Art is working towards targets in the following areas:

(N/A)

Therefore...

2) Courtauld Institute of Art scored 0 / 50% for their sustainability strategy.

0% Section 2. Human Resources for Sustainability

0%

The full methodology for how we score this section here.

Having a policy on environment and ethics is a good start - working out how to meet the policy with a strategy is a great start - next we wanted to see how well Courtauld Institute of Art resource their policy and strategy. You can't meet your targets without dedicated staff to do all the hard work!

We looked to see whether environmental sustainability if someone in the university senior management team has responsibility for sustainability. It really helps when climate and social justice issues are the responsibility of someone who can make decisions about how the action can be resourced. If we found that someone, you can read about them here: (N/A)

1) Courtauld Institute of Art scored 0/20% for senior responsibility for sustainability

We also wanted to see how many staff were currently employed to work on sustainability issues, and whether students and staff could find them easily online and contact them. We thought the number of sustainability staff should also be shown in relation to the number of staff and students at the university.

Courtauld Institute of Art has 355 students,less than 250 staff and 0 sustainability staff

When assessing the number of dedicated sustainability staff at Courtauld Institute of Art - we looked for the following info:

  • job title / role
  • contact info
  • specific area of sustainability

If we found that information, here's the link: (N/A)

2) Courtauld Institute of Art scored 0/55% for numbers of sustainability staff

Once a university has employed staff, it can be hard for them to do their job without money available. People & Planet looked for evidence that the sustainability strategy was resourced with a budget and that costs were included as part of the commitment.

3) Courtauld Institute of Art scored 0/10% for evidence of a budget to fund the sustainability strategy.

It isn't just the job of sustainability staff ... the whole university community is key to the culture of sustainable development, and when properly supported, they can make all the difference!
We looked at whether the university supported a staff engagement scheme (like Eco-Champions or inter-departmental green team competitions) to engage all staff across the university in environmental and ethical practice through training, workshops and projects.

4) Courtauld Institute of Art scored 0/15% for supporting a staff engagement scheme.

10% Section 3. Environmental Auditing & Management Systems

10%

The full methodology for this section is here.

We looked at how well Courtauld Institute of Art manages and audit their environmental performance and progress. If you can't measure it, you can't improve it!

is not accredited to an externally verified environmental management system (EMS) so we scored it according to it's own management systems as described on their website (or not). We looked for regular auditing in 8 key areas. The audits needed to have established a baseline (i.e. measured where progress was at in that moment in time), and to have been undertaken or updated in the last 5 years.

scored /40% for auditing in the following areas:

 

0% Section 4. Ethical Investment

0%

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

Investments in the fossil fuel industry or arms trade can be contradictory to an institutions broader sustainability aims and goals. A strong ethical investment policy ensures an institution’s investments and banking practices are conducted transparently and in an economically-viable, socially-responsible manner.

1a) Courtauld Institute of Art scored 0/10% for having a publicly available ethical investment policy. The policy is here if we found one: (N/A)

1b) and  0/60% for including specifics within the policy, including: (N/A)

2) Courtauld Institute of Art scored 0/10% for reviewing and making progress on the policy's objectives - which is here is we found it: (N/A)

3) 0/20% for making a public announcement that it won't invest in fossil fuels and or arms, and if they have, you'll find it here: (N/A)

When looking at our Fossil Free university campaign aims, here's Courtauld Institute of Art's own Fossil Free outlook:

Divestment Commitment none

Fossil Free Scorecard: Courtauld Institute of Art

Investments

£2,560,000
Invested in fossil fuels. That’s 6.4% of total endowment fund of £40,000,000
Data estimated from FoI

Research funding

(No research funding from fossil fuel industry.)

(No research funding into renewables industry since 2001.)

90% Section 5. Carbon Management

90%How well is Courtauld Institute of Art managing its carbon emissions?

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

As it's a funding requirement, there aren't many universities that don't have a plan for managing and reducing carbon emissions, here's what we found: courtauld.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Carbon-Management-Plan-for-The-Courtauld-Institute-Version-4-17-April-2015.pdf

1) Courtauld Institute of Art scored 25/25% for having a publicly available carbon management plan that meets set standards

Jargon buster: the following are examples of greenhouse gas emissions called 'scope 3' emissions: business travel, student and staff commute travel, student end of term travel home, supply chain (stuff the university buys) and waste (i.e. rubbish).

2a) 5/5% for including scope 3 emissions within the university Carbon Management Plan.

2b) 5/5% for reporting the university's scope 3 emissions to the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). 

In the most recent year, Courtauld Institute of Art reported emissions from: waste, business travel and supply chain to HESA.

It's important that universities aren't forgetting their halls of residences or other student and staff accommodation when thinking about carbon emissions. If we found info on this, it will be here: (N/A)

2c) Courtauld Institute of Art scored 5/5% for publishing carbon emission data related to both in-house and externally provided student accommodation.

3) Courtauld Institute of Art scored 25/30% for including baseline figures for scope 3 carbon emissions  in the following: Waste , Water , Procurement, Travel. business trips and Travel. commute.

Courtauld Institute of Art  scored 25/30% for including targets to reduce scope 3 carbon emissions including Waste , Water , Procurement, Travel. business trips and Travel. commute.

10% Section 6. Workers Rights

10%Is Courtauld Institute of Art behaving responsibly to those it employs and those who work in its supply chains?

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/25% for being a Living Wage accredited employer.

2) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/15% for being a Fairtrade status University

3) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 10/40% for improving workers rights in the university's ITC supply chain by working with Electronics Watch

4) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/20% for improving workers rights in an area of the university supply chain other than electronics

0% Section 7. Sustainable Food

0%How sustainable is the food and catering at Courtauld Institute of Art?

Want more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/10% for having a publicly available sustainable food policy meeting set standards

If we found one, it should be here: (N/A)

2) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/50% for continual improvement in sustainable food across the university catering outlets and conference services through a sustainable food framework and for the level reached on that framework OR for sustainable food activities

3) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/10% for specifying that contract caterers and suppliers meet the requirements of the university sustainable food policy

4a) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/5% for being certified to the Marine Stewardship Council standards - ensuring traceability of sustainable fish all the way to your plate

4b) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/5% for using local food in university catering or campus to kitchen food projects

4c) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/5% for providing free access to drinking water across the university and for highlighting where this can be found on the university website (here if we found it): (N/A)

5) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/15% for providing space or other resources for university community food projects

If they are, you can find out more here: (N/A)

15% Section 8. Staff and Student Engagement

15%

How well is Courtauld Institute of Art engaging its staff and students in sustainability?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 5/60% for having a strategy in place for student and staff engagement that includes a framework to track progress against smart targets and for including the following engagement actions:

c student induction

  • Oversight and involvement of students and staff in the development and ongoing monitoring of the university Carbon Management Plan.
  • Oversight and involvement of students and staff in the development and ongoing monitoring of the university environment or sustainability policy / plan / strategy.
  • Engagement opportunities for sustainability are a component of student induction processes.
  • University actively supports an annual Go Green Week or environment / sustainability week.
  • The university runs environmental sustainability campaigns that reach all students and staff.
  • Availability of university funds and / or resources /support for student or staff-led practical sustainability projects

2) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 10/10% for evidence that the university sustainability policy is included in staff inductions, and if it is, you can see more here: (N/A)

3) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/10% for Trades Union representation on the membership of sustainability strategy committees

4) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/10% for student representation on university committees concerned with estates, planning, finance and strategic decision making. 

5) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/10% for students' union progress towards environmental sustainability.

0% Section 9. Education for Sustainable Development

0%

How well is Courtauld Institute of Art including sustainability in its education?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/20% for its public commit to education for sustainable development (ESD)

2a) Courtauld Institute of Art scores0/50% for having a framework or strategy for ESD

2b)

3) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/10% for providing suitable support and training for ESD

4) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/10% for evidence of student coursework linked to sustainability projects to improve the environmental manegement of the university (often called the Living Lab)

5) 0/10% for supporting or highlighting School, Faculty or Research team projects for Sustainability, including the pedgagogy of sustainability

0% Section 10. Energy Sources

0%Where does Courtauld Institute of Art get its energy from?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0/45% for using combined heat and power (CHP) energy.

2) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0.0/35% for generating some its own electricity (the more it generates the higher the score).

3) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0.0/20% for buying some or all of its electricity from renewable sources. 

0% Section 11. Waste and Recycling

0%

How does Courtauld Institute of Art perform on waste, as compared to other universities?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0.0/50% for recycling 0.00% of its waste.

2) Courtauld Institute of Art scores 0.0/50% for the amount of waste per head (staff and students) compared to the rest of the sector.

77.5% Section 12. Carbon Reduction

77.5%

How well is Courtauld Institute of Art reducing its carbon emissions?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) 40.0/50% for carbon intensity change over the last 12 months (since the last University League).

2) 37.5/50% for achieving a 33.87% reduction in its carbon emissions since a 2005 baseline.

0% Section 13. Water Reduction

0%How responsibly is Courtauld Institute of Art using water?

Need more? The full methodology for this section is here.

1) 0.0/67% for its use of water per head (staff and students) compared to other universities

2) 0.0/33% for use of grey water (like rain water harvesting)

(N/A)

We depend on grassroots donations to keep us independent and radical.